Prevalence of active and passive smoking during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study

Wallysson Costa Batista, Poliana Valdelice Cruz, Cristiane Baccin Bendo, Carolina Castro Martins

Abstract


The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of active and passive smoking during pregnancy and its association with sociodemographic indicators, as well as perinatal and postnatal outcomes in newborns. Methods: This cross-sectional study was comprised of 431 pairs of mothers/ newborns. The study variables were: preterm birth, birth weight, oral mucosal lesions, sociodemographic indicators and smoking data. We collected data from medical records and through a self-administered questionnaire answered by mothers. A pediatric dentist examined the newborns for oral mucosal lesions. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between active and passive smoking and the other variables (α=5%). Results: The prevalence of active (9.5%) and passive smoking (4.2%) during pregnancy was low. Active smoking was statistically associated with low birth weight (OR: 2.4; 95%CI:1.1-5.3), lower schooling level (OR: 0.2; 95%CI:0.1-0.5) and mothers aged ≥36 years old (OR: 4.9; 95%CI:1.2-20.0). Passive smoking was not statistically associated with the other variables. There was no association between active or passive smoking during pregnancy and premature birth and oral lesions of the newborn. Conclusions: The prevalence of active and passive smoking were low. Active smoking was associated with low birth weight, maternal age and mother's schooling, suggesting a social influence of smoking behavior among a population with a lower educational level. There was no association between active and passive smoking and prematurity and oral lesions of the newborn

Keywords


Pregnancy; Birth weight; Premature birth; Infant, newborn; Oral health

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organization. WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco smoking 2000–2025, second edition. Geneva: WHO; 2018. [cited 2020 Jun 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/surveillance/trends-tobacco-smoking-second-edition/en/.

Gakidou E, Afshin A, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sept;390(10100):1345-422.

World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2019. Geneva: WHO; 2019. [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/en/.

Coelho SA, Rocha AS, Jong LC. Consequences of passive smoking in children. Cienc CUiD Health. 2012 Mar;11(2):294-301.

Geelhoed JJM, El Marroun H, Verburg BO, Van Osch-Gevers L, Hofman A, Huizink AC, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy, fetal arterial resistance adaptations and cardiovascular function in childhood. BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(6):755–62.

Pintican D, Pojenar AA, Strilciuc S, Mihu D. Effects of maternal smoking on human placental vascularization: a systematic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gyne. 2019 Jul;58(4):454-9.

Paulsson L, Bondemark L, Söderfeldt B. A systematic review of the consequences of premature birth on palatal morphology, dental occlusion, tooth-crown dimensions, and tooth maturity and eruption. The Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2)269-79.

Ebrahim E, Paulsson L. The impact of premature birth on the permanent tooth size of incisors and first molars. Eur J Orthodo. 2017 Nov;39(6):622-27.

Cruz PV, Bendo CB, Occhi-Alexandre IG, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA, Martins CC. Prevalence of oral inclusion cysts in a Brazilian neonatal population. J Dent Child. 2020 May-Jun;87(2)3-10.

Campos M, Bravo E, Eugenín J. Respiratory dysfunctions induced by prenatal nicotine exposure. Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2009 May;36(12):1205-17.

El-Mohandes AAE, Kiely M, Blake SM, Gantz MG, El-Khorazaty MN. An intervention to reduce environmental tobacco smoke exposure improves pregnancy outcomes. Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):721-8.

Prabhu N, Smith N, Campbell D, Craig LC, Seaton A, Helms PJ, et al. First trimester maternal tobacco smoking habits and fetal growth. Thorax. 2010 Mar;65(3):235-40.

Brazilian Market Research Association. Brazilian Association of Research Companies Brazil 2015 criterion and update of class distribution for 2016. ABEP, 2016. [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil.

Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1990.

Padovani MCL, Santos MTBR, Sant’anna GR de, Guaré RO. Prevalence of oral manisfestations in soft tissues during early childhood in Brazilian children. Braz Oral Res. 2014 Aug;28(1):1-7.

Goel P, Radotra A, Singh I, Aggarwal A, Dua D. Effects of passive smoking on outcome in pregnancy. J Postgrad Med. 2004 Jan-Mar;50(1):12–6.

Vitoria PD, Nunes C, Precioso J. Parents’ educational level and second-hand tobacco smoke exposure at home in a sample of Portuguese children. PJP. 2017 Jul-Aug;23(4):221-4.

Orton S, Jones LL, Cooper S, Lewis S, Coleman T. Predictors of children’s secondhand smoke exposure at home: a systematic review and narrative synthesisof the evidence. PLoS ONE. 2014 Nov;9(11):e112690.

Ward C, Lewis S, Coleman T. Prevalence of maternal smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy and impact on birth weight: retrospective study using millennium cohort. BMC Public Health. 2007 May;7(1):81.

United States Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General; 2006. [cited 2019 Dec 11]. Available from: http://www.prevention.ch/sg2006s.pdf.

Abu-Baker NN, Haddad L, Savage C. The influence of secondhand smoke exposure on birth outcomes in Jordan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Feb;7(2):616–34.

United Nations Children's Fund, World Health Organization. Low birth weight: country, regional and global estimates. UNICEF: New York; 2004. [cited 2019 Nov 112]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_24840.html.

Crane J, Keough M, Murphy P, Burrage L, Hutchens D. Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Mar;118(7):865–71.

Pogodina C, Huber L, Racine E, Platonova E. Smoke-free homes for smoke-free babies: the role of residential environmental tobacco smoke on low birth weight. J Commun Health. 2009 Jun;34(5):376–82.

Kharrazi M, De Lorenze GN, Kaufman FL, Eskenazi B, Bernert JT, Graham S, et al. Environmental tobacco smoke and pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology 2004;15(6):660–70.

Friend GW, Harris EF, Mincer HH, Fong TL, Carruth KR. Oral anomalies in the neonate, by race and gender, in an urban setting. Pediatr Dent. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):157–61.

Baldani MH, Lopes CMDL, Scheidt WA. Prevalence of oral alterations in infants seen at the public pediatric dental clinics from Ponta Grossa - PR, Brazil. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2001 Nov-Dec;15(4):302-7.

Perez-Aguirre B, Soto-Barreras U, Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Reyes-Macias JF, Santos-Diaz MA, Loyola-Leyva A, et al. Oral findings and its association with prenatal and perinatal factors in newborns. Korean J Pediatr. 2018 Sep;61(9):279–84.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.102383

Licença Creative Commons

e-ISSN 2177-0018 / ISSN 0566-1854.

descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da fotodescrição da foto