Fertilizing Capacity of the Cryopreserved Sperm of Prochilodus brevis

Larissa Teixeira Nunes, Mayara Setúbal Oliveira-Araújo, Júlia Trugilio Lopes, Piscila Silva de Almeida-Monteiro, Renata Vieira do Nascimento, Vanessa Alves Pereira, Yasmin Maia Ferreira, Assis Rubém Montenegro, Jéssica Uchôa Ferreira, Carmindra Sandra Brito Salmito-Vanderley

Abstract


Background: Seminal cryopreservation is a technique that optimizes aquacultural production, as it requires less breeding and enables reproduction outside of the breeding season. This technique also helps to preserve species, thus reducing the pressure on the natural stocks. Several studies have sought to develop freezing protocols that result in semen of a good quality. However, some studies do not evaluate the ability of frozen semen to produce viable larvae. Therefore, the aim of this study was to verify the fertilizing capacity of the frozen semen of Prochilodus brevis.

Materials, Methods & Results: Semen from twenty adult males of the Brazilian bocachico was collected and evaluated to establish the total motility, curvilinear velocity, straight linear velocity, average path velocity, membrane integrity, pH, and concentration. Six pools were formed, each of which was diluted in a freezing medium containing 5% glucose with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or 5% glucose with 10% methyl glycol (MG). The samples were loaded into 0.25 mL French straws, frozen in a dry shipper, and stored in a liquid nitrogen canister. The semen was then thawed and evaluated to establish the total motility, curvilinear velocity, straight linear velocity, average path velocity, and membrane integrity. For the fertilization test, four females were used. The oocytes from each female were divided into three batches and fertilized with either fresh or cryopreserved semen. The rates of fertilization, hatching, and larval survival were then measured. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using SAS (2002). The frozen semen with glucose + DMSO was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the frozen semen with glucose + MG, in all seminal quality parameters evaluated (63.95 ± 15.88% and 25.36 ± 3.53% for the motility, 36.38 ± 7.02 μm.s-1 and 20.45 ± 2.84 μm.s-1 for the curvilinear velocity, 19.26 ± 2.74 μm.s-1 and 3.03 ± 1.40 μm.s-1 for the straight linear velocity, 25.70 ± 6.51 μm.s-1 and 6.90 ± 1.12 μm.s-1 for the average path velocity, and 63.58 ± 6.95% and 35.58 ± 11.26% for the membrane integrity, respectively). MG were very close to zero and not statistically significant. Regarding these same parameters, there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) when the fresh semen was compared to the cryopreserved semen with glucose + DMSO (36.25 ± 2.5% and 29.16 ± 5.64% for the fertilization rate, 38.56 ± 11.23% and 29.33 ± 11.75% for the hatching rate, and 11.59 ± 5.16% and 7.63 ± 5.46% for the larval survival rate, respectively).

Discussion: This is the first study of the artificial fertilization of Prochilodus brevis using cryopreserved semen. Seminal quality parameters are important for predicting the success of the cryopreservation technique, however, in vivo tests are essential to confirm such success. Thus, obtaining larvae is a major step towards the standardization of a cryopreservation protocol for a particular species. It is known that cryopreservation reduces the seminal quality but is a necessary process for the conservation of male gametes in the long term and, as shown in this study, good results can be obtained. In this study, the best results were obtained with the inclusion of DMSO in the freezing medium. This effect can be attributed to DMSO having a very low molecular weight, which decreases the formation of ice crystals. Considering the results obtained, we concluded that it is feasible to obtain larvae of the Brazilian bocachico using frozen semen in a 5% glucose solution with 10% DMSO.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Almeida-Monteiro P.S., Oliveira-Araújo M.S., Pinheiro R.R.P., Lopes J.T., Ferreira Y.M., Montenegro A.R., Melo-Maciel M.A.P. & Salmito-Vanderley C.S.B. 2017. Influence of vitamins C and E on the quality of cryopreserved semen Prochilodus brevis (Prochilodontidae, Teleostei). Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 38(4): 2669-2680.

Alves D.E.O., Silva M.F.M., Molina W.F., Costa S.A.G.L. & Nascimento R.S.S. 2017. Desenvolvimento ontogenético inicial de Prochilodus brevis (Steindachner, 1875) (Characiformes). Biota Amazônia. 6(1): 70-75.

Austuriano J.F., Cabrita E. & Horváth A. 2017. Progress, challenges and perspectives on fish gamete cryopreservation: A mini-review. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 245: 69-76.

Bobbe J. & Labbé C. 2010. Egg and sperm quality in fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 165(3): 535-548.

Cabrita E., Martínez-Páramo S., Gavaia P.J., Riesco M.F., Valcarce D.G., Sarasquete C., Herráez M.P. & Robles V. 2014. Factors enhancing fish sperm quality and emerging tools for sperm analysis. Aquaculture. 432: 389-401.

Lopes J.T., Pinheiro J.P.S., Nunes L.T., Pinheiro R.R.R., Souza M.E.M., Almeida P.S., Nascimento R.V., Campello C.C. & Salmito-Vanderley C.S.B. 2014. Avaliação de diferentes crioprotetores e taxas de diluição na criopreservação seminal de Prochilodus brevis. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal. 38(3): 170-175.

Lovelock J.E. & Bishop M.W.H. 1959. Prevention of freezing damage to living cells by dimethyl sulphoxide. Nature. 183(4672): 1394-1395.

Martínez-Páramo S., Horváth A., Labbé C., Zhang T., Robles V. Herráez P., Suquet M., Adams S., Viveiros A., Tiersch T.R. & Cabrita E. 2017. Cryobanking of aquatic species. Aquaculture. 472: 156-177.

Moore J.C., Berlow E.L., Coleman D.C., Ruiter P.C., Dong Q., Hastings A., Johnson N.C., Mccann K.S., Melville K., Morin P.J., Nadelhoffer K., Rosemond A.D., Post D.M., Sabo J.L., Scow K.M., Vanni M.J. & Wall D.H. 2004. Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecology Letters. 7: 584-600.

Nascimento M.M., Nascimento W.S., Chellapa N.T. & Chellapa S. 2012. Biologia reprodutiva do curimatã comum, Prochilodus brevis (Characiformes: Prochilodontidae) no açude Marechal Dutra, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Biota Amazônia. 2(2): 31-43.

Nascimento R.V., Leite-Castro L.V., Montenegro A.R., Oliveira-Araújo M.S., Lopes J.T., Almeida-Monteiro P.S., Ferreira Y.M. & Salmito-Vanderley C.S.B. 2017. Influência do tempo de resfriamento e soluções diluentes sobre a congelabilidade do sêmen de Prochilodus brevis. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 45: 1480.

Nunes L.T., Oliveira M.S., Lopes J.T., Souza M.E.M., Pinheiro R.R.R., Campello C.C. & Salmito-Vanderley C.S.B. 2016. Cryopreservation of Prochilodus brevis semen: freezing media and thawing rates. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 37(3): 1643-1654.

Oliveira-Araújo M.S., Salmito-Vanderley C.S.B., Almeida-Monteiro P.S., Lopes J.T. & Leite-Castro L.V. 2016. Dose inseminante e resfriamento de embriões de peixes de água doce. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal. 40(1): 35-40.

Reynalte-Tataje D.A., Lopes C.A., Ávila-Simas S., Garcia J.R.E. & Zaniboni-Filho E. 2013. Artificial reproduction of neotropical fish: Extrusion or natural spawning? Natural Science. 5(7): 1-6.

Takagi M., Boediono A., Saha S. & Suzuki T. 1993. Survival rate of frozen–thawed bovine IVF embryos in relation to exposure time using various cryoprotectants. Cryobiology. 30(3): 306-312.

Taylor B.W., Flecker A.S. & Hall Jr. R.O. 2006. Loss of a harvested fish species disrupts carbon flow in a diverse tropical river. Science. 313(5788): 833-836.

Thirumala S., Campbell W.T., Vicknair M.R., Tiersch T.R. & Devireddy R.V. 2006. Freezing response and optimal cooling rates for cryopreserving sperm cells of striped bass, Morone saxatilis. Theriogenology. 66(4): 964-973.

Viveiros A.T.M. & Godinho H.P. 2009. Sperm quality and cryopreservation of Brazilian freshwater fish species: a review. Fish Physiology Biochemistry. 35(1): 137-150.

Viveiros A.T.M., Nascimento A.F., Leal M.C., Gonçalves A.C.S., Órfão L.H. & Cosson J. 2015. Methyl glycol, methanol and DMSO effects on post-thaw motility, velocities, membrane integrity and mitochondrial function of Brycon orbignyanus and Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes) sperm. Fish Physiology Biochemistry. 41(1): 193-201.

Zaniboni Filho E. & Weingartner M. 2007. Técnicas de indução da reprodução de peixes migradores. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal. 31(3): 367-373.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.92791

Copyright (c) 2019 Larissa Teixeira Nunes, Mayara Setúbal Oliveira-Araújo, Júlia Trugilio Lopes, Piscila Silva de Almeida-Monteiro, Renata Vieira do Nascimento, Vanessa Alves Pereira, Yasmin Maia Ferreira, Assis Rubém Montenegro, Jéssica Uchôa Ferreira, Carmindra Sandra Brito Salmito-Vanderley

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.